Code Puke "Pink"

Let's All Embrace Diversity Or NOT!
I have observed carefully for long time how liberals always want us to "embrace diversity". But, do they practice what they preach? The reality is no they don't.

The liberals are the "enlightened one" and have all the answers. If you don't believe it just ask them. Pose any problem to them and their narrow little minds will come up with a solution that always involves "feelings" and "diversity". The enlightened ones also known as liberals or socialist prey upon the sufferings of others in order to manipulate them and gain their support. They constantly point out the differences between the working class, the poor and the rich. By manipulation they cause the "have not's" to covet the possessions and property of the "haves." 100% of the "haves" at one time were "have not's" yet they found a way to have by their own efforts and didn't rely upon socialism to "take" it from others. Much like a marketing campaign, the socialist use so called "hot button" issues to motivate their inferior, uneducated subordinates to rally around their cause. Once in power, the socialist are more cruel, demanding and tyrannical than any Czar or ruler could ever be. The liberals of France complained that the poor were being executed by the King, so what did the hypocrite liberals do? Cried Freedom and executed the wealthy and nobles, took their property and possessions and kept them for use by the new ruling class socialist elite.

The liberals ask us all to be open to the religion and culture of others and to embrace the diversity of people from all over the world. Then in the same breath, they attack people who don't believe the way they do. They make fun of Christians for example. The beliefs of Christians violates the liberal secular agenda and is therefor "evil." Have you ever noticed that when it comes to "Islam" these same "freedom warriors" are silent? Do you see them marching in the streets of Muslim countries protesting the rights of women and gays? Hell no. The "tolerant and peaceful" Muslims would kill their asses in approximately 2.8 seconds and drag their bodies through the streets. Sharia law provides the death penalty for anyone who speaks against the Prophet Muhammad and the Holy Quaran just to bring you up to speed here. The Muslims will carry this out with the same enthusiasm as do sports fans. The socialist agenda is to point out that their are many religions and yours is just as unimportant as the next persons. Eventually they introduce the concept of humanism which is nothing new at all, it's merely hedonism with an elitist spin. Once the guiding principals of religion have been abolished by the socialist educational system, there are no more right and wrong and there is no more God, the rules of society are out the door and are quickly replaced with the intellectual philosophy of which ever "elite intellectual" the socialist can sit on a throne.

We are to embrace the African and Muslim cultures they tell us, yet, in Islamic countries and in Africa there exists slavery. The point of fact is always redacted or not mentioned. Women and gays are treated with the utmost contempt and their lives have very little value there as well. Shall we embrace this diversity? Look no farther than the Sudan of Africa to find the combination of Islam and slavery at work, yet, the liberals are somehow absent from the streets of these countries. Where are they? They are in fact here and in other "free" nations telling us to "embrace diversity" and ignore the actions of their socialist counterparts working in Africa who seize power by killing the peasants.

There are sincere and faithful Christians ,and needless to say, they are human beings with human rights, but in Islamic countries, the Christians along with the Jews are imprisoned, robbed of their possessions, tortured and killed. They are the "Infidels". Yet their is no "human rights" protest coming from the liberals to plea with the world to stand up for the rights of Christians and Jews. In fact, go to any liberal university and you will find academic chairs being funded by Islamic regimes and those so called "academic chairs" spew forth hate speech and lies against Jews and Christians unabated. When questioned about it, the liberal asks us again to embrace diversity and points out that the "Islamonazi" is merely exercising his right to free speech and he is struggling against oppression. The Islamic chairs always 100% of the time fail to mention the crimes against humanity that they carry out. Yet to them, everyone else is evil. Where do they get the justification for their actions? It's simple, the Quaran and Sharia law.

Yet, the lowly gay man and the meager woman of the Islamic states , if they speak out are instantly silenced by execution by the same regimes that fund these free speaking "academic chairs" who are here spewing forth hate speech with the blessing of the "enlightened liberals". The enlightened ones tell us that we cannot and should not be suspicious of Muslims and their culture yet they are paranoid and hateful towards Christians and Jews. Jewish students are constantly under attack on the college campuses of America due to the actions and support of the "enlightened ones". The intellectual elitist have forgotten the study of "collective behavior" in racial and ethnic groups. Hate gives birth to death and destruction, so where there is "hate speech" you will soon find liberal socialism's calling card, genocide.

The immutable laws of common sense tell us that the "enlightened ones" are full of crap. Hypocrisy is the heart and soul of liberalism and liberals are not at all truly liberal. The term liberal indicates a willingness to be "liberal or generous" towards others and not a select few. Those with whom they don't share a religious or cultural "embrace" with, they treat with contempt and hatred. The liberal is quick to point out that the "less educated" must be guided by the intelligence and enlightenment of the "liberal" as they can't fend for themselves without direction. (See poor whites or non-degreed whites and conservatives). The liberal will point to some jungle tribe and inform us of their wonderful way of life and then turn towards the Hasidic Jews and call them oppressive and out dated. I invite the liberal to travel to any Islamic state and proclaim their beliefs in the streets and see what happens.

If a man or woman of African decent becomes educated and successful, the enlightened ones tolerate them being called "Uncle Toms or Sell Outs". The liberals tell the inner city poor, especially blacks, "it's o.k. to hate white people who have oppressed you, it's o.k. to embrace a culture of hate and to express your "inner city" culture that you have developed. If you examine the "liberal" operated inner city schools you see an extremely high drop out rate among minorities. Education is not valued very highly in these areas and that is always the fault of the oppressive white man. We must have someone to blame and the Caucasian race is an easy target. Therefor, if you are non-Caucasian please feel free to hate and let your bigotry spread like an STD. You are entitled to hate and blame someone other than yourselves. The "enlightened ones" say so. If you are a Caucasian and you embrace hatred and bigotry, then you must be a socialist. Hatred and bigotry has infected all races of people and it has been spread by socialism or the ideology of socialism for thousands of years and no, socialism is not a modern concept. It has been around a long time but was always called something else until modern times and modern terminology created a label for it.

It is impossible for anyone who lives in a ghetto to escape poverty and rise to the ranks of the mainstream because the "white man" keeps you down and won't give you a chance. With this unstoppable liberal truth, how do we explain the Jews? They lived in ghettos, over 6 million were murdered by the "enlightened socialist" and yet, those who survived, left the ghettos, got educations and became very successful. You see, Jews are not considered "Caucasians" and were considered less than human by the "enlightened socialist" of the Hitler era. You can't get more "white" than the Aryans of Germany.

Where then is the excuse? Why is it those who were considered less than human rose above it all and yet the liberals say the oppressed minority can't because of the oppression of the "white man". The Jews who were considered less than any minority on earth survived and became successful all the while being told it was not permissible. They did it by faith, education, and sheer will of character. Today the "extermination" of the Jews is still a topic of all Islamic states and socialist regimes. The Jew is still here and I applaud them all. Today it's going to be extremely hard to commit genocide against the Israelites because they will unleash a nuclear firestorm on the next socialist or Islamic regime that attempts it and deservedly so.

Hitler was an enlightened liberal. Yes he was. He was the leader of the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany, aka the Nazis. Have you ever noticed that when these enlightened "socialist" take power just how conservative they are? How materialist they are and how rich they become? Have you ever noticed that these champions of the workers are the first one to employ slave labor and low wages with long back braking hours? Look no further than the former Soviet Union and the current Chinese regime. Have you ever noticed that when a "socialist" regime is attacking and killing at will anyone in their field of vision, the "liberal" is silent? Yet when a "socialist regime" is getting its long over do ass kicking, the liberals scream constantly, "stop the war."

I witnessed the disaster in the middle east develop for years. Before and after WWII the Jews began returning to their homeland of Israel, there was no Palestine. Soon after the Jews began "greening up and fixing up the land they purchased from people who didn't own it" which were the Arabs/Muslims who sided with Hitler to exterminate the Jews, took notice and decided to continue what Hitler failed to do, so the outrage began. Did you know that the letter P does not exist in the Arabic language? Did you know that the mythical "Palestine of Islam" was in Egypt? Then it was in Jordan, then Lebanon and now it's part of the ancient land of Israel. Also they Islamist fail to mention that Palestine was a word used by the Romans to rename the nation of Israel aka the Land of Judea after the famous Rebellion? There is no ancient Palestinian language, or culture, or people other than the Jews and those who occupied the land before the nation of Israel was created, the Philistines were Medes, and Greeks. But Yassar Arafat, (may be rot in Hell) pined away for a mythical place that he created in his own mind. The King of Jordan chased the so called PLO out of Jordan and into Lebanon. Egypt chased them out of their land into Jordan. Let's look at socialism inside Islam. The Fatah are communist, Hamas are Nazis, Al-Queda are Nazis, Hezbollah are Communist, Al Queda are Nazis socialist, and they all join forces when necessary and the rest of the time they are crawling over each other to seize power. Isn't socialism fun especially when you combine it with religion? Normally the socialist are considered "organic pagans" but socialism itself denies religion other than worship of the supreme leader or stateless state. They constantly speak out both sides of their mouths.
Let's look at the wonders the ubiquitous liberal socialist have brought forth to our world in the name of enlightenment. Nazism, commonly known as National Socialism refers primarily to the ideology and practices of the Nazi Party. The reason there is blatant hypocrisy within the ideology of Nazism is that it is in fact the "workers party" and Communism also calls itself the "workers party" yet the two ideologies clash and there remains to this day an underlying hatred between the two political belief systems and yet an uneasy alliance. They both gain power by preying on the poverty and weakness of the poor and working class. Fascism is another "workers party" that believes in corporate control of the poor and huddled masses while spoon feeding them daily rations of food, water, air and thought. 100% of the "enlightened liberal socialist" have, once gaining power became dictators and tyrants. This will never change and has not changed thus far.

Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of a classless , stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production and labor . Yet communist regimes always call people "enemies of the state" and there are two classes of people in this classless state, the powerful and the powerless or the "Officials and the workers". It is considered to be a branch of socialism a broad group of social and political ideologies which draws on the various political and intellectual movements with origins in the work of theorists of the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution , although socialist historians say they are older. Simply put, it's a way for sociopaths and nefarious individuals to seize power and rule over others. All socialist suffers joyfully from narcissistic personality disorders. They feel the world evolves around them and only they have the answers. They feel also that they are under appreciated and when they become "freedom fighters" it is only done so in order to take away the freedom of others.

Communism attempts to offer an alternative to the problems believed to be inherent with capitalist economies and the legacy of imperialism and nationalism Communism states that the only way to solve these problems would be for the working class, or proletariat to replace the wealthy bourgeoisie, which is currently the ruling class, in order to establish a peaceful, free society, without classes, or government. Yet the "communist government" then classes people as either government workers or non-government workers." In other words the people have no freedom and every aspect of life is dictated by the anal state that doesn't even exist according to communist doctrine yet the government does in fact exist. You see how liberals can create an intellectual "ice cream headache" while all along claiming to be the "enlightened?" The dominant forms of communism, such as Leninism Stalinism, Maoism, Trotskyism and Luxemburgism, are based on Marxism, but non-Marxist versions of communism (such as Christian communism and anarchist communism also exist and are growing in importance since the fall of the Soviet Union. Have you ever noticed that the "enlightened" can never agree on which "ism" they want to hold as most sacred?

In the United States the "socialist or communist" couldn't get elected to any office on a national or even local level. Therefor they quietly joined the Democratic party and now simply refer to themselves as "Liberals". Barak Obama spent 20 years in an "Afro-Centric" church which is based on Christian communism. The leader of the so called "Afro-Centric" church is in fact an extremely wealthy preacher who resides in a 10 million dollar mansion. His name is the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and he is closely allied with other "communist" such as the Nation of Islam. These people make a living hating anyone who is not of their color or religion. No different from the Nazis or White Supremacist of today. I for one, do not shove my culture and beliefs down the throats of others as I fully understand they don't want it. Therefor, with that said, I expect the same courtesy. I do however enjoy being informed and exposed to the culture of others as I study human behavior and find that culture is the collective behavior of a people which is learned through their trial and error experiences.

In the United States the enlightened ones have control over the educational system and have caused it to become an utter failure. There is no discipline in the homes or in schools anymore and there are no rules. You have no religious freedom in schools unless you are Muslim and threaten Jihad. The focus is not on actual education but indoctrination of socialist ideas. In the US, kids come to school with weapons and massacre students and some drop out, so the US educational system is falling behind academically in comparison to the rest of the "free world." I fully understand in this world there is diversity but embracing an aspect of culture that I don't share and have no need of or desire to practice is not only a violation of my free will but down right stupid. If I am being forced to embrace someone else's "diversity" then it's only fair they embrace mine. But that is not the "enlightened way".

In the US left wing schools, children are indoctrinated to rely upon the state and the enlightenment of "intellectuals" who pound into their heads that religion and family are the enemy and thus redefining family and religion is the norm. This is not done in order to "enlighten" the youth but in order to control them by breaking the bonds of family and place of worship. It has worked quite well and the practice is not new, the Chinese and former Soviets utilized the same "educational" tactics in order to break down family ties and replace them with ties to the "state" which if you listen to them, the "state" does not exist. But in fact it does and the state becomes the family and the place of worship and guess who rules the state? You got it, the party leaders. Nice power grab huh? Yes, the gullible being taken in by the greatest con-artist who ever lived. All in the name of "socialism and enlightenment." Like Nietzsche said. "Tell a lie long enough and people will believe it."

Socialism has goals and these intellectual elitist are actually caught up in their own narcissistic mania. They are master manipulators and they use their talents to serve themselves and could actually care less about the "less educated peasantry". Power is coveted by human beings as it is their nature. Power protects us and makes us feel safe to live our lives the way we want, everyone else be damned. Pedophiles are attracted to children because they are weak and defenseless and it is quite easy to exercise power over them. The liberal socialist are to me, the pedophiles of the political world. Like sexual pedophiles they "groom" their victims and always take their side and comfort them until they have them emotionally naked and the rape begins. They offer women, gays, minorities and even the majority, an imaginary power they never possessed. They convince the "masses" that those who have a perceived power must be overthrown for the good of the peasantry. Then, the liberal socialist aka the "secular humanist" seizes power and the killing begins. They tell you that they alone are the way to true freedom, but in the end, 100% of the time it is a massive death march carried out by socialist and the lines of humans marching are always those who have no power. After all, wasn't it the "socialist" that murdered the Russian Royal family? The Czars little boy who was sick and weak was sitting in the lap of his father when both were shot. These "socialist" are the personification of evil and yes evil does exist. Evil extends to you absolute power and control over the weaker of the species without regard to that individuals right to life and free will.
For those of you who just tuned in, "diversity" represents "differences" and it is the "differences" we are told to focus on and embrace not our commonality. We are to embrace the differences between us and this programs the mind to the fact that we are different on a superficial or cultural level and this, in the end, "divides" us. This is not a new practice nor is it a noble thing. That which divides us is the enemy of us all. Israel had 12 tribes in 12 different regions of the land but focused on the commonality and were therefor one people. The differences of the Hebrew people being religion bound them together yet kept them seperate from the rest of the world for spiritual reasons. This is not a bad thing but a "cultural" thing and yet those who chose to become Jews were then a part of the collective whole. We are all of the human race and therefor should be united together for the common good of those residing on the planet with us. But, the socialist use these very "noble" ideas to seperate us and once we are seperated they can better control us through diverse psycho-social dynamics and if you look clearly at socialism it divides the people and further weakens those who are not of the enlightened leadership. It's simply a power grab utilized by manipulative psychopaths.

Look no further than the Peoples Republic of Capitalism (China) and you will see the "liberal socialism and Marxism" in action. The Chinese slauthered the ruling royal class and replaced it with another "royal class" that does not wear a crown but is no different than the royals they replaced. The Chinese are major world players in the Middle East and they for reasons of power and profit side with regimes that are similar to their own. China allies itself with Islamic states against the state of Israel and the West. China supplies Iran and others Islamic terror groups with arms and other military supplies as well as intelligence. I can tell you that, with 100% certainty, that the end of all this power grabbing and suppresion of freedom will result in the worst global war that mankind has ever witnessed.

If you take notice or have the ability of reasoning and understanding then you can clearly see what is going on in the Middle East. There has never been a Palestine or a Palestinian people. The name Palestine was coined by a demented Roman leader who wished to replace the name Israel/Judea from the face of the earth. So, being cursed with a speech impediment, he would not rename it "Philistia" but "Palestina" and when he did this, it was not nor had it ever been "Arab" land but was in fact Eretz Yisrael or the land of Israel. The people were Jews and they spoke their ancient and sacred language of Hebrew. Now we have Islamofascist and their enablers protesting, teaching, preaching and pining for their long lost mythical Arab land of Palestine.

It's funny that Arafat and his ilk tried to liberate part of Egypt calling it Palestine and the Egyptian military prevented that. Then, Arafat and his band of merry men dicided that Jordan was Palestine and that didn't work either. They slaughtered the inhabitants of the Jordanian Kingdom in a specific region until the forces of King Hussein put an end to the "invasion". Then the PLO was pusued into Lebanon where again they claimed Palestine and the Jordanian forces pursued them into Lebanon to exact revenge for the murder and pillaging of Jordanian towns. Israel was there fighting Muslim terrorist and militants and when the so called "Christian Falangist" aka Nazis began killing off illegal PLO settlements they called "refugee camps" the PLO accused Israel of war crimes because Israel refused to enter into the fight on their behalf. This is insane but the PLO has never been known for rational thinking.

All of this is tired old Sino-Russian Marxist tactics of warfare. It's referred to as "psychological warfare" and being that all the Arab states in all their Islamic glory could not defeat the tiny nation of Israel led by a woman, this enraged them. Arabs who fled the region at the orders of the Arab alliance sold off their land before and some after fleeing. Gullible Israelis not only won the land back(which was theirs historically in the first place) in war, as is international custom and the rules of war, but paid for the land to those who claimed they were disposessed.

Israel, during the time of the Jordanian liberation war from the PLO, took in refugees in what is now called the West Bank. The UN had promised to resettle these refugees who came out of Jordan to other Islamic states but never did. Slowly the number of refugees grew and more immigrants arrived calling themselves refugees. This was totally under the direction of Russian and Chinese intelligence operations. Israel was now drowning in so called Palestinians who were bent on one thing. The destruction of the state of Israel and the total genocide of Jews.
The so called Palestinian cry "freedom and liberation" and in the same breath will tell anyone who is stupid enough to listen, that Islam teaches "freedom" is evil and one must "submit" to Allah by the teachings of Muhammed and freedom is therefor the opposite of submission and therefor the enemy of Islam. Do you have an ice cream headache yet following this type of reasoning? They claim they want freedom from the oppressive Israelis and yet freedom is the enemy of Islam. Have you noticed that over a million arabs have decided it's better to live in Israel as Israeli citizens than to die in an Islamic country from which they fled? Are all these Arabs wrong?

I traveled to the Holy Land and had a great time. I spoke with Arabs living there who told me of their long lost Palestine. Instead of laughing I took the opportunity to listen and understand that the lie they told, they finally believed. They even told me there has never been an Arab Palestine and we laughed and laughed. I told them that I was a German citizen as I do speak the language. I told them I was a Lutheran and my family had owned land here before the return of the Jews. They informed me how to reclaim my land that my mythical family owned. I was given an address in Bethlehem and the name of a man to see and he would have the records. I ask how could he have the records, all was lost in the fighting wasn't it? He said there were never records but this man creates them.
I traveled to Bethlehem and found the location on the east side of town. It was an old shop that sold brass work and other items. I looked at the brass work and other items and they were stamped "Made in China" on the bottom. I laughed within myself. The man who identified himself as Muhammed Bin Ibrahim motioned for me to come into the back of the shop behind the curtain. I spoke to him in Duetche and he had no idea what I was saying. Then I asked in English with a fake accent, do you speak english. He smiled and said "yes". I reached inside my jacket and handed him a hand drawn plat map of the land I was claiming as mine with latitude, longitude, length, width and other survey information. He took the information and went to work. Two hours passed as we smoked cigarettes and I watched this man create a "deed and official plat map" stating that my family owned the land and had owned it for over 300 years. He sprayed the documents which were fresh and new with old cold coffee. Then he placed the documents in a small oven and dried them. When he was finished the documents looked very old yet official. The documents were in Arabic and I was unable to totally read them but that wasn't important. I returned to Israel and found an arab Israeli friend named Salahadin who was born in Egypt. I asked him to examine the documents and he did so. I burst into laughter and I instantly knew what he was laughing at. I said, how authentic does it appear to you? He said very much authentic but, he said. "You own the Temple Mount?" We both kept laughing.

I told him since I owned the Temple Mount that it is obvious that the Dome of the Rock was on my land and I should deserve comepensation in the form of back rent, shouldn't I? He said. "This is a dangerous thing you have done. The Muslim Authority will never accept this." I didn't care, it was now my land just as all Jewish land was supposedly Arab lands. The shoe was now on the other foot. I phoned the Muslim Religious Authority and informed them that I owned the land. They were furious to say the least. I told the woman that I have documents to support my claim. She said in broken english. "This is not possible." I told her that it not only was possible but true and I would bring her the documents. I went under armed escort to the offices of the Muslim Religious Authority who were not every good hosts and presented my documents. They examined them and spoke among themselves in Arabic. They glared at me and a very short fat Egyptian man sitting in a wooden chair spoke and said. "This is a forgery and you cannot claim our land." I replied. "It's not your land it's mine and I have authentic documentaion in Arabic script saying so." They ordered me out of the offices and out of Arab territory. I left with my armed escort and we all had a good laugh. We then traveled to the Interior Ministry of Israel and presented them with the same documents. The records examiner was a Polish Jew and he looked them over carefully and burst into laughter. "Zo, you own ze Temple Mount?" I said to him in Hebrew, "Khen" meaning yes. We laughed ourselves to tears. I told him I was not a Palestinian but that I was a "Klingon" from the ancient Klingon Empire and we were pining away for our long lost home land. We laughed even more.

The same scam used by Arabs to claim Jewish lands were not accepted as "proof" but when an Arab does it, then it's "authenticated". The records examiner looked up at me over his glasses and said. "You are one meshugen Jewish kid." I agreed. Yes, I am a Jew and a Zionist but was having fun proving a point and exposing yet another Arab scam. About a month later, no less than 413 arabs showed up claiming the same piece of land in the area of Tel Dan. They all carried with them the same identical documents made by the same Arab that I used, yet none of them had ever been in Israel before in their lives. When asked to show where the land in question was on a map which was subtitled in arabic, none of them could find Tel Dan on the map. This was funny too.

When each were faced with counter claims from other arabs they all said it was still their land and that the other claimants were cousins. Big family huh? I informed the records examiner that my family, the Johnson (made up gentile name) were the true and historical owners of the entire region containing Tel Dan and pointed to it on the map. I also told him that my Arab cousin has the deed to the land and if given a couple of days I'd produce the necassary docuements. He laughed and hit me with a bagel ordering me out of the office so he could do some actual work. We again had a good laugh.

It's actually comical watching the "unenlightened" attempt to utilize the techniques of the so called "enlightened." Socialism is everywhere and mostly ineffective except for when it comes to oppressing, killing, taking property and all together destroying civilizations.

Margaret Sanger, a devout socialist, was a pioneer of legalized abortion and the founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest provider of abortions in the U.S. Sanger was also a well-known eugenicist whose writings make clear the historic connection between abortion on demand and eugenic thinking.

Mary Senander, the Minneapolis Star Tribune : Contemporary liberal social planners have elevated Sanger to sainthood, protesting that her birth control campaign was nothing more than a vehicle for economic betterment and health for the masses. But Sanger's own well-documented words, publications and associations indicate a deeper and darker motivation. Sanger began publishing the Birth Control Review in 1917 and served as its editor until 1938. The May 1919 Review proclaimed, "More children for the fit, less for the unfit." By unfit, Sanger meant the mentally retarded or physically handicapped; later her definition expanded to the poor whites and anyone who was deemed at the time be considered, "colored."

Socialism and the worship of death as a means to control the masses.
Eugenics part of Sanger legacy
by Mary Senander Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN), October 14, 1993
Ironically, just as the provocative Anne Frank exhibit leaves town, self-appointed custodians of the First Amendment are flocking to defend Margaret Sanger, a woman who embraced and launched for public consumption some of the very ideas that eventually led to Anne Frank's death.

Those who support posting Margaret Sanger's picture at a local Catholic university library maintain she is a worthy role model of one who put her convictions into action. If we accept that myopic premise - paying little or no attention to what those convictions were - there is no problem, But Sanger's commitment to eugenics - an elitist and dangerous philosophy that favors (among other things) controlled breeding to improve the quality of the race - disqualifies her as a figure worthy of emulation.
Contemporary liberal social planners have elevated Sanger to sainthood, protesting that her birth control campaign was nothing more than a vehicle for economic betterment and health for the masses. But Sanger's own well-documented words, publications and associations indicate a deeper and darker motivation. Sanger began publishing the Birth Control Review in 1917 and served as its editor until 1938. The May 1919 Review proclaimed, "More children for the fit, less for the unfit." By unfit, Sanger meant the mentally retarded or physically handicapped; later her definition expanded.

In November 1921 the review issued a clarion call: "Birth control, to create a race of thoroughbreds." Sanger suggested that parents should "apply for babies as immigrants have to apply for visas." By 1925, she was a true convert to eugenics, setting up birth control clinics in poor neighborhoods populated by "Latins" and "Slavs" (both groups heavily Catholic) and "Hebrews" - groups she had targeted as threats because of their increasing numbers. She spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among them those "whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers."

Her plan for peaceful genocide gained converts. Within a few years, the review had a circulation of about 10,000, and distinguished experts of like persuasion were eager to contribute to its pages. In 1933, her Review published a special edition devoted entirely to eugenics, with contributors like Dr. Lathrop Stoddard and Harry Laughlin, both directors in the American Birth Control League (ABCL) that Sanger had founded in 1923. (The league eventually became known as "Planned Parenthood.") Stoddard's books were blatantly racist. In 1924, he had testified before Congress as an expert witness on America's immigration policies, warning that Jewish money and Jewish guile were inflicting on this continent a race of low types who had no legal right to be admitted even by the existing legal standards. Another contributor to Sanger's journal was Norman E. Himes, who claimed there were genetic differences between Catholics and non-Catholics.

In the October 1926 Review, Sanger announced her idea for eugenic sterilization: "There is only one reply to a request for a higher birthrate among the intelligent, and that is to ask the government to first take off the burdens of the insane and the feeble-minded from your backs." Eugenicists like Sanger concluded that the poor were both stupid and immoral, fueling campaigns for sterilization during the Depression. (By 1932, 27 states had compulsory sterilization laws.)

In 1939, the ABCL and Sanger's Clinical Research Bureau merged to form the Birth Control Federation of America (BFCA). Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, previously a director of the ABCL, was elected the BCFA regional director in the South. Almost immediately, he drew up a memorandum for his plans for the "Negro Project." Gamble's plan included placing black leaders in positions where it would appear that they were in charge (in order to counter the perception by black leaders who might regard birth control as an extermination plot). Sanger agreed: "We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

Histories of the German euthanasia movement generally agree that German sterilization policies and, eventually, Hitler's Final Solution were strongly influenced by the American eugenics movement.
While she may have been uncomfortable with the (logical) extension of eugenics in Hitler's Germany, I've never found anything to indicate that Sanger recanted her belief in eugenics.

The philosophy that some people are better off dead or not being born - not only for their own sakes but for the sake of others - remains alive and well. Bigotry and racism still compete for followers and manifest themselves in programs from "racial cleansing" to eugenic abortion. As one example, Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders, one of Sanger's contemporary disciples, lauds abortion for lowering the numbers of children born with Down's syndrome and insists on more funding for Planned Parenthood and its policies.

Sanger's legacy, Planned Parenthood, continues to target minority and poor neighborhoods with its school-based and other programs. U.S. abortion kills proportionately more black babies than white. Planned Parenthood also exports its elitist population control programs to the Third World.

With or without a poster, the spirit of Margaret Sanger lives. But is it really a spirit we want to celebrate and defend?
Copyright © 1993 Star Tribune

On the news last night were a gathering of morons known as "Code Pink". These left wing brain donors claim they speak for "America". Well, they don't speak for me. It was obvious the protest they "staged" was not only childish but obnoxious. They all dressed in pink and staged a protest at the marina where some left wing limp wristed milquetoast congressman was staying on his houseboat. Naturally the story line goes, "we women speak for America, no more sanctions, no more war!" Then the efiminate milquetoast emerges from his houseboat to agree with the pinks and there were hugs and kisses, a good time was had by all and insane liberalism saves the day. The spineless and two faced congressman states that if he were president he would sit down and talk with these tyrrants and despots and that he has sat down and spoken with other dictators and insane serial killers who happen to be the heads of some of the most backward and evil states on earth. All this was staged to say "it's O.K. Obama to sit down and speak with the Hitlers of the world."

If history and commone sense have taught us anything is you can't sit down and have an intelligent and rational conversation with a serial killer who has a knife at your throat. These duplicitous frauds in pink are nothing more than a thinly vailed group of "enlightened" Marxist. You never see them complaining about regimes that murder people and enslave millions, they are always bitching about capitalist empires and the like. I say, we federally fund a trip for these misanthropic cows to Iran so they can show how "dedicated" they are to their cause and by all means, prostest and scream their stupid babble at the regime of Mullahs and Ayatollahs. I swear to you, that within seconds of their arrival and protest they would be screaming for some capitalistic warrior to come and rescue them before the blade drops on their necks or the stoning begins.

Don't be fooled by these frauds, they have a twisted agenda. I had the displeasure of attempting to have a conversation with one of these misanthropic clowns and it went like this: "What is your problem?" I asked. "America is enslaving poor people and people of other cultures around the world!" She screamed with very bad halitosis that caused me to wretch. "America? What about the people of Islamic culture that enslave human beings in the Sudan? Can you blame that on America? Does the fact that the US and it's allies bringing freedom to oppressed people piss you off?" I countered. I use their own insulant tactics to provoke them and it also addles their thought processes and brings out the real person lerking inside their hideous bodies. "It's better to be enslaved with a full belly than to be free and starve to death!" She screetched. My reply. "No bitch, it's better to be free with a full belly than to be a slave with one!" She screamed. "You are a pig and a meterialistic money grubber!" I ended the conversation with. "And you are a sexually frustrated cow who has control issues, not to mention a nonsensical Marxist."

I left her screaming and shouting obsenities just as I had planned. It seems that the manipulators are easily manipulated. I still chuckle over those times. It gives me great joy to cause them gastric upset and to increase their blood pressure to the point of stroke. If only they would all collectively have one, the world would be a much more quite place to live and raise a family.

I finally met another "Pink" named Sharon who had no choice but to keep her big mouth shut and her BS down to a whisper. I met her on purpose at a library. As we sat down to "discuss" her mental illness and total lack of vision. She offered me a bite of a "Soyjoy" bar which I refused, and told her I'd just eaten the equivelant of a baby calf that was stalled and milk fed it's entire short life. I was lying but I knew it would set her teeth on edge and making this shrew and those like her uncomfortable, is one of my greatest pleasures in life.

I told her I had a few questions and was trying to understand the point of view of her ilk. She perked up as all the enlightened ones do when you fake an interest in what they have to say. I was merely setting her up. "We represent all Americans who are opposed to war and the oppression brought about by the United States. You see, sanctions and war are not the answer. We must open a dialog with these leaders and when you do, you will find them accomodating and understanding once we embrace their ideas and lifestyles." I fell into a state of psychogenic shock. I couldn't believe the words that had just fallen from her crumb covered lips, but then again, what else was I to expect from this pink clad bovine?

"Do you not understand that some people, not unlike yourself, can't be reasoned with?" I aked. "That's the problem, no one wants to try and discuss our differences with them, they feel alienated and backed into a corner. We should offer them alternatives and they will gladly accept if we just try. We can't always use violence and deprivation to force our will upon others." She proclaimed. "Well they do." I countered. "Only because we force them too." She responded with a smile on her face. "Oh, so we Americans wrote the Quaran, preached it, taught it to the poor unsuspecting Muslims, then we introduced the doctorine that all infidels, that would be us, should be killed and that all who do so are to be great in the faith?" I asked. "No, but we force them to make bad choices." She blabbed on. " I was beginning to get an icecream headache listening to this idiot. "So, everything is America's fault right?" I aked knowing the forthcoming answer. "Yes, beginning with slavery and the taking of native American lands." She remarked with an ugly grin and a raising of the furrowed brow. "I see, native American land your living on guilt free while you protest others who do and you failed to mention the fact that it was other Africans who sold the slaves to the Dutch in the first place and it was also America who freed her slaves but I guess those points escape you because of the guilt you have living on native American lands." I informed.

"See, you keep changing the subject." She said in frustration. "No bitch, try to keep up, you brought the subject up and I busted you on it." I replied. "We are getting no where with this conversation." She whined. "It's because when you are proven wrong and your argument won't hold water, you get defensive and resort to preschool tactics, and that is the problem. Your ignorant, obnoxious, arrogant and you have an exhalted idea of yourself. You and your kind have no answers other than stupid ones and if you truly believed your own bullshit you would give your home and lands to the nearest Indian tribe and travel to these oppressed countries and spew forth your bullshit there. But no, people like you and Rachel Corry was an excellent example, go to these backward third world havens for Marxism, Fascism and all the other 'isms and join in the violence you protest. Like the martyr Rachel Corry who traveled to Israel to protest all the while assisting human garbage in transporting war supplies to terrorist who murdered unarmed civilians. She got exactly what she deserved and that was being flattened by a Druz Muslim on an Israeli bulldozer." I said.

She became livid and screamed. I rolled my eyes and pointed her out to the other library patrons while hold me up my hands in confusion. She was asked to leave the library or the police would be called. I told the librarian that she was a mental patient and shouldn't be off her meds for this is what happens when she is. She, the pink, screamed "I am NOT on medication for mental illness! " The librarian quited her and said. "Denial is not healthy for you and it causes problems for others." The Pink responded. "You people are crazy, you are all against me for my beliefs and you will all pay in the end! Tyrants!"

I was laughing inside histerically, she was showing her true colors and by her own actions had convinced everyone in the library she was in fact as nutty as squirrel turds. The Pink then turned on her heels and raced towards the exit with the librarian in tow. She ran outside, got in her car and sped away. The librarian had written down her tag number on her palm and phoned the police. I was in rare form that day and enjoying every second. I apologized for the Pinks actions and the librarian said she understood but would have to ban her from the library after the police discovers who she is. I told the librarian I understood for the safety of the Pink and the innocent members of the public it must be done.

I sat down in the reference section to due some more research on a couple of subjects that interested me and I think it was about 45 minutes later the librarian reappeared with a police officer. The officer was a woman and you could tell by the way she carried herself, a seasoned veteran. She asked for my personal information which I gladly gave and got my side of the story. I told the officer that I was trying to have a civil conversation with the lady about current political events and she became enraged and began shouting and screaming. I told the officer that I believed her to be mentally ill as no sane or rational person would lose their mind like that. The officer said that they had stopped the vehicle bearing her plate number about 6 blocks away as she was attempting to get on the interstate. She said the woman seemed to be upset and crying and the more they questioned her the more enraged she became and began screaming about tyrrants. I told the officer that was exactly what she was doing here but mumbling about native american lands and such. The officer then further said she became so out of control and began resisting the directions of the officers. Pepper spray was used to subdue her and she was taken into custody. The officer further told us that the woman was being admitted for observation at a psychiatric facility and they would need our statements in writing. The librarian and I agreed. The officer informed the librarian that she needed to come down to the court clerks office and file a "criminal tresspass" complaint so they could ban her from the library. Inside I was cheering and singing happy songs but on the outside I was acting as if I was sad for her.

Don't get me wrong, I don't hate liberals. I hate hypocrites and the BS they want to shove down the throats of others. It is not the responsibility of any living human being to make amends for the actions of others that occured centuries ago. We simply cannot do that and should not be expected to. We should however do everything in our power to see to it that the mistakes and injustices of the past never repeat themselves and that includes "chatting with and appeasing tyrrants."

As for me, I'm not a republican as many would suspect but I do vote for the candidate that I feel would be best suited for office. We are long overdue for a good woman in the White House and we had the opportunity but the liberals took away Florida and Michigan after bitching about the Bush election in Florida. Then, the liberals in control of the democratic party took the two states divided the electoral votes in half and gave 50% to Obama who never bothered to even get on those states ballots. Again, the liberals don't care the will of the voters and they screamed at the Bush administation, they care about forcing others to obey them. They feel they had a right to punish Florida and Michigan because, how dare they vote for a "white woman" when we have a duplicitous black Afro-centric Marxist in the running. Then, in the same breath, those who tossed a woman under the bus complain that the Republicans aren't for womens rights? Utter BS.

Obama has changed his stance of nearly everything he lied about during the campaign but do you hear anything from the left other than excuses and double speak? No and you won't. Therefor, I think we should elect John McCain, let him serve a four year term then bring back Hillary and elect her as should have been done in the first place. But first we will have to eliminate the leadership of the Democratic party or run Hillary as an Independent candidate.

Have a nice day and please, go hug a tree. They are feeling sad and lonely.