Obama Denies It All

Brief Summary at first glimpse:

Born 4Th day of the month of August, 1961 :He is rather set in his ideas and tends to impose them on others, seeing himself as the final arbiter of good and correct ethics. His belief in discipline makes it hard for him to express his feelings, and as a result he suffers a great deal emotionally. When it comes to work, he drives himself tirelessly -- and, unfortunately,everyone else, too. He has a decided tendency to overwork and if need be he will schedule time for recreation which he uses to think about his next dynamic move.

Barak Hussein Obama Sex M
Countries Lived In: Indonesia, Kenya ,Africa

Place of Birth Hawaii Kai, HI 15 USA 08/04/1961 12:00 - Julian day 2437516.42Adjust 10.00 ST 8.22 Lat 21.17 Long 157.42

There's an unmistakably regal arrogance to Barak Obama. Obama has a reputation for being conceited, but think again, it's narcissism that Obama displays. The Obama's love to feel important, but this generally takes the form of wanting to change the world in some way? To make the world a different but not a better place. Obama wants to create a world in his own image. They want to leave their mark and that mark is the downfall of the United States. What greater place in history could anyone hold but by being the one who brought down the most powerful nation on earth from within. If you think this is far fetched simply look at the people he associates himself with. Terrorist, hatemongers, and radical religious leaders who spew forth hatred towards others based on skin color and religious identity. When pressed about his associations Obama simply ignores, disavows, then separates himself for political purposes and moves on as if any accusation against him is meaningless. Example: If Joe Blow attends NAMBLA meetings for 20 years, then one can accurately determine Joe is a pedophile or he wouldn't be attending the meetings. Obama sat in a church which preaches bigotry, hatred and plays the blame game against "whitey" for 20 years. He uses these people and their psycho-social dynamics to obtain elected office all the while smiling and agreeing with them. Then when the obvious is pointed out to him, he will then "disavow" himself from them in public but not in private.

Obama's core base are extreme left wing socialist who for cultural reasons cannot or refuse to chase the so called "American dream". Those who do chase the American Dream are the enemy because they choose to follow this dream without the permission and consent of those who oppose it. Like jealous and ill mannered children the left wing has all the answers. They alone have the answer for the environment, how to raise children, they define education as to whatever their left wing doctrine espouses. Only they have the answers. College kids and I mean "kids" as they are clueless, immature and arrogant. They have all the answers. How do they have all the answers you ask? They have science or quasi-science, technology, ideology, dogma, and philosophy. Combine all this together and it's an actual religion. They sadly dismiss experience, morals, societal rules, customs, (unless it's an exotic, or selfish one), and they mistake deviousness for intelligence. Wisdom is a myth among these types as they have no understanding of it or it's value. They join in, blaming the victims and champion the cause of any oppressor who tickles their ears or presents a way of thinking that frees them to be selfish and superior to those whom they hate.

The history of the socialist is long and bloody. More blood has been shed by "socialist" than from any other movement known to human kind. Socialist are not in fact living up to the purest definition of the word. A socialist is to me, by their own actions, a massive group of sociopaths who hold a disdain for society and feel they alone have the answers. On college campuses they "preach" cultural diversity while cursing the traditional culture of those who are different from themselves such as "white Anglo Saxons" aka : "Whitey". Always, it depends on the culture you have as to whether or not these "enlightened" ones will accept you. You must do as they demand and live as they instruct or you are the enemy of the great social cause for which they see themselves as "champions".

"Uncle Joe Stalin" murdered more than 10,000,000 human beings himself. Lennon killed his millions, Pol Pot, Hitler, and the list goes on and on. They snuff out human life as if it has no meaning all in the name of socialism's Utopia. This mindset and these types of people are still with us today. The President of Iran is an example. He wants to wipe the earth clean of Jews and destroy the state of Israel. As I have said before, "ignorance can be cured but stupid is terminal." If you observe wars, such as the one currently in Iraq, you'll notice that the left is screaming, "end the war, bring home the troops, Bush lied." What you fail to see is that Saddam Hussein ruled over a "socialist" government as its dictator. He, at a whim could kill without opposition. This is very much a wonderful thing to socialist because they see Hussein as a leader who is protecting the masses from those who would bring down socialism and end the manufactured Utopia he created. "We are fighting for oil" The reality is it was necessary to overthrow this man who was attacking Kuwait, Israel and was bent on disrupting the worlds oil supply. Like it or not, there is a global oil based economy. If the global infrastructure fails without a ready replacement, the devastation would be unimaginable. Anarchy and war on a scale which mankind has never experienced.

Russia suffered for decades under this "Utopia" and millions were murdered for having what Obama calls the "audacity of hope" that he now espouses in his book. Yes, and the moderates and conservatives here in the United States have now awakened to the realization that socialism is coming to our shores with a vengeance. The result will be a civil war where socialist will lose greatly. At present their is a "social war" being waged via the media, college campuses, public schools, churches, mosques and in the political arena. If these battle fields fail to suffice those engaged in this epic struggle then it will end up being fought out violently in the streets from house to house. People who have freedom are not willing to give it up for some socialist dictatorship where they will be enslaved by the government and pressed into service like drones.
They (the Obama's) are generally motivated by affection given by their people, and often have big dreams and plans to that involve masses of people obeying them and following their lead. They enjoy this more than breathing. All socialist dictators do. Name one that didn't.Generally, the Obama's are results driven. After all, they are attracted to the good things in life, and they know they have to hustle to get them. It is sometimes difficult to imagine Obama's as go-getter's in the material sense of the word but if you happen to catch them in one of their languid moods you'll see them draped in the trappings of materialism. These people can't sleep in, laze around, and luxuriate for long periods of time. The reason being is a lack of trust of the public. They feel they must constantly be in the limelight with all eyes on them. They want to read the crowds and maintain their cult like power over their followers. However, when they do go to work, they do it with intensity and determination. In this way, they are not unlike their heroes Marx, Lennon, Hitler, and numerous other Islamic warlords. The worst thing you can do to Obama is accuse him of bad intentions. Displaying behavior that makes him think you don't appreciate him runs all over him and will result in feeling his "wrath". The arrogance of Obama when his wife is criticized takes us back to a time when no one spoke against the King or the Dictator.

These seemingly happy, jovial people become enraged when others don't see them for their noble intentions which are actually a feeding frenzy for their own egos. It was however quite fine to attack Hillary Clinton when she was first lady and even their daughter.Loyal to himself and his ideologies, and mostly pathological in his lying, Obama is, after all, a man on a mission. He holds on to situations and people for a very long time before he gives up or is finished using them. There is an unmistakable idealism to Obama's view of the world and the people in it. Often, the Obama's have a very powerful inner code that they answer to. Although on the surface, the Obama's appear rather humble, they can actually be some of the most vicious and evil souls around. They are the first to blame others when something goes wrong and take credit when someone else's work goes right.

Once again, it's the Obama's self-importance at work, and this characteristic works in unexpected ways. Instead of being the humble and compassionate people of the Dem's fantasy reputation, they are usually very self-aware, self-conscious, conceited, self-absorbed show-offs and, yes, even narrow minded.Short description:He is masterful, likes authority, aspires towards his ideals and is power hungry. He likes to give orders that he refers to as advice. He is dishonest, frank, rude, narcissistic and insincere. He affiliates himself with those who want power and they give it to him. See Farrakhan, Wright, and others.Weaknesses: pride, vanity, arrogance, presumption and disdain of others.He has a desire to be something special or to experience something more than the ordinary. He is a day-dreamer and idealist longing for greatness which came from loss and separation issues caused by his father leaving him. This has haunted Obama his entire life. It is not easy for him to trust others, even (and perhaps especially) people who might seem from the outside looking in and will always gravitate towards unsavory types because they possess a power to detach themselves from humanity or the need for "connection by commitment".

He is looking to identify with something beyond what is normally expected of people. He had a childhood that didn't help him direct or define his life so he followed the path of power and glory. Perhaps the early family life was lacking in supervision or clearly defined rules. His father figure was absent and the second one was distant and ineffective. He used to imagine a glorified image of his father as a child and by result has created himself in that image.

Whether the images were very positive or very negative (as it swings between these extremes), the images are not very clear or rational. Whatever the case may be, he struggles with defining who he is. He will gravitate towards the "wrong people", or get in with the "wrong crowd" in an attempt to define who he is and what power he can get from them to help create this world that he dreams of being King and dictator of.
He is not susceptible to being taken advantage of by others, especially by men or authority figures. On the contrary, he is a master manipulator. He is not easily led astray by peculiar desires or self-destructive habits as he feels the most important creature in the universe is in fact himself. There is nothing this man won't do to protect himself and his vision. In order to add a greater-than-ordinary dimension of experience to his life that helps him to feel special and important, He will be attracted to people with power fueled behaviors, such as secret affairs, dictators, warlords, powerful religious leaders or other escapist behaviors. Anyone who commands and controls lures Barak Obama. He is drawn to this control due to the pathology of his childhood where he had no control over others or even himself. He has craved that power all his life and is now in easy reach of it and it does not matter the cost to his family or anyone around him. He doesn't care about the "peasants" other than using them as cheerleaders and getting their votes. He gets involved in social issues to create a mass of people by being popular in their causes and is then able to point the peasant in his track record on defending them. He has in fact not been a defender but a controller. His "civil rights" legal work was simply to learn the ropes and manipulate the constitution and the law of the land.

To punish "whitey" and gain popularity among urban blacks such as the ones following Farrakhan and Wright was his inner goal.
In many ways, he feels a strong urge to glamorize his role in the world. There can be some confusion about the past (such as remembering childhood experiences in ways that are far removed from reality), and a tendency to daydream about being someone more "important" than he feels he is. He may struggle with early conditioning that made him feel tossed aside or neglected in some way, and certainly not directed or supported. He is very sensitive, especially with regards to any real or imagined blows to his ego. Still, he is likely to recognize at some point in his life that he does have a tendency to engage in escapist and destructive fantasies or associations. It is useful to for him to be able to connect these behaviors with their probable source, which is likely to be a weakly-defined ego and identity in childhood. Familiarity is important to Obama. His people are mostly uneducated or easily deceived and strong-willed. Among those who fit this bill are those of college age and people who live in the inner city, all of whom are also of the escapist and power hungry. They want to change the world to the way their ego demands it to be. They feel with their senses and they are pretty much rooted in their ways. They revel in material comforts--in fact, building a solid and comfortable "crib" or home and material foundation helps to keep them feeling safe and content and in control.

Power is what they crave because during their developmental stages they were often times denied power or "say" in their homes. These people were self willed, spoiled, and very arrogant children who learned the subtleties of manipulation at an early age. They feel they are the "most educated" and best suited to command others to march humbly into the world they create and control.It isn't wise to try to push the Obama's and their followers into doing anything, but once they have made a commitment, they're persevering out of a sense of arrogance and not purpose. There's a steadiness to their position or ideas that is comforting to those enjoy "following". The dictatorial streak in these psychotic individuals can be maddening to more open minded and progressive personalities. They tend to go out of their way to avoid "messy" or unpredictable situations, crises, and emotional displays. Instead, they focus on creating a reliable and secure life around themselves but will organize like a single cell organism to get what they want. In relationships, the Obama type communist will not recognize their victims need for change, growth, or emotional relief.Short description: Convinced of his ideas and strong-willed. He is foresighted and willful. He knows how to manipulate. He appreciates all the good things in life. He appreciates and protects himself above all else.Weaknesses: excesses in pleasure, materialism, power, sensuality, and thoughtlessness.Obama can be quite expressive and animated in his speech.

He has an outstanding memory and tends to pick up a lot of information from his environment. He loves to chat and to exchange his ideas for yours. For the most part, He is focused on day-to-day activities in his communications rather than on ideas of others. He is naturally curious about how he can best win you over and very disinterested in your facts and how they effect him and his vision but will with his dogma and ideologies overwhelm your facts with his vision. Others find him very easy to talk to because he will let you yammer on until you have fully expressed your ideas and leave you feeling as if he actually cares. He doesn't, he is merely thinking of ways around your ideas and how he can prove you wrong with his.

Then he will seem accommodating and curious, but people are not as well equipped to handle an individual such as Obama. He thrives on change and variety. You see, no one helped him when his life was changed and a variety of men came to his house, so his deep seated anger is reflected in his desire to disrupt the lives of those who he feels are of the ilk that caused his childhood trauma. Obama's lack of power in his childhood created a deep frustration. He was moved from country to country and state to state without being consulted. His birth father left him and caused psychological trauma as he has tried to deal with the "whys" of it all. His stepfather was in total control and Obama resented this. He learned how to manipulate and control during his youth. He observed those with power included politicians, lawyers, clergy, warlords and militants. He is a passionate person, who feeling in control of the lives of others thrives on this type of power he was once denied. Although his emotions are powerful and immediate, his passion is generally controlled and directed towards those people or causes that enable him to exact his revenge. He gravitates towards Islamic terror groups who in fact support him because they are vengeful and let no one stop or dissuade them. He is a driven person who nevertheless doesn't get too carried away or controlled by his opposition.

He has visited the Palestinian occupied territories but didn't bother stopping in to visit with the "Zionist Jews." Hamas supports him, Fatah and Hezbollah also, but he claims he has no part in them, but has gone and visited with them. He has been an affiliate and friend of the Nation of Islam for years, yet denies it.

Because his emotions are strong and he knows how to channel them into constructive channels, he doesn't easily understand such things as "crimes of passion", impulsive behaviors, or emotional excitability in his thoughts. He appears generally open, accepting, and natural in his philosophical expressions but that couldn't be farther from the truth. He needs an emotional connection in order to feel complete on a physical level and his wife and biggest cheerleader fills the bill. He may have an affection and talent for sports, as do most emotionally arrested adolescents in adult bodies, but other factors such as the "rush of power" are necessary to provide the motivation and commitment. Short description: He is blunt, dishonest, full of vigor and ambition. He is strong-willed and powerful at work, in the home and in the community. He is a very hard on himself when he fails, but, above all, he is even harder on others whose capacity for action is not as great as his.He easily controls his feelings, as I have observed blunted emotions in him. He has a sense of duty, of self-esteem and is prudent when it comes to decisions that effect him. He can concentrate on a long-term task, manual or intellectual. He perseveres and is serious in everything he does.He has a feverish, non-constructive restlessness. He is sometimes too susceptible to his own passions. His life is full of change and he plays chess mentally against himself. He is irritable and stubborn at times due to an inner restlessness that is hard to satisfy. He has difficulty focusing on the true feelings of others. Nervous strain is easily hidden by him. His friendships are like his professional and love life - sometimes unstable but nonetheless chosen by him for their usefulness.

There is a strong need for closeness, but when people get too close, he gets cagey, as he values personal freedom just as much, but not so for others. He will make decisions for them.He wants to know the bottom line, and is good at scoping out a situation and finding answers to problems that face him and not others. In fact, he is a problem-flipper, this means he will create problems for the opposition instead of dealing with or solving his own, and will spend a lot of time directing others to solve his problems if need be. Very friendly and seemingly positive, he can be charming in a warm way. Enthusiastic speaker, speaks with authority and false sincerity. Great sense of organization. Obama likes to take risks in jest and for amusement and the adrenolin rush He may sometimes come across too strongly or offend sensitive folk with a somewhat authoritative tone but he actually doesn't care for as they say, "from the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks. "Hold on a second sweety." the reporter was beneath him so he treated her like dismissing a child. How dare she have the audacity of hope to speak to him while he was focused and busy?

How this will play out in foreign policy:
He is and will be frivolous and imprudent. He lacks judgement, and is full of self-importance. He has difficulty in realizing his plans, because he lacks clarity and rates his qualities higher than they are. He is poised to pounce on Israel and other US allies while opening the door for Islamitist or Islamonazi's. Obama must have revenge for his life and he must have it now. He must have the power he believes he was destined to have.
He is reserved, conservative in dress and personal finances, he is liberal in spending the money of others, ambitious and stubborn. He has a slow mind when stressed and has problems expressing himself so he fills speaches with tired and often repeated sentences at each local. He is "scripted" but must have the final say in what goes into the script. It must make hims sound important and knowledgable. Social success is slow and laborious, but he does not give up easily and is patient and will climb any social ladder to get what he needs regardless of the "color" of that ladder.

(Barack Hussein Obama II ) is the junior United States Senator from Illinois. He is now the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party in the 2008 presidential election. He is the first African American to be a major party's presumptive nominee for President of the United States.
A graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School Obama worked as a community organizer and practiced as a civil rights attorney before serving in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. From 1992 to 2004, he also taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School . Following an unsuccessful bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000, he announced his campaign for the U.S. Senate in January 2003. After winning a landslide primary victory in March 2004, Obama delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in July 2004. He was elected to the Senate in November 2004 with 70% of the vote.

As a member of the Democratic minority in the 109th Congress he cosponsored legislation to control conventional weapons and to promote greater public accountability in the use of federal funds. He also made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. In the current 110th Congress , he has sponsored legislation regarding lobbying and electoral fraud , climate change , nuclear terrorism , and care for returned U.S. military personnel. Since announcing his presidential campaign in February 2007, Obama has emphasized ending the war in Iraq , increasing energy independence , decreasing the influence of lobbyists , and promoting universal health care as top national priorities.

Obama was born on August 4 , 1961 , at the Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu , Hawaii , to Barack Obama, Sr. , of Nyangoma-Kogelo Siaya District , Kenya and Ann Dunham , of Wichita , Kansas . His parents met while both were attending the University of Hawaii at Manoa , where his father was enrolled as a foreign student. They separated when he was two years old and later divorced.

After her divorce, Dunham married Lolo Soetoro , and the family moved to Soetoro's home country of Indonesia in 1967, where Obama attended local schools in Jakarta until he was ten years old. He then returned to Honolulu to live with his maternal grandparents while attending Punahou School from the fifth grade in 1971 until his graduation from high school in 1979. Following high school, Obama moved to Los Angeles , where he studied at Occidental College for two years.

He then transferred to Columbia University in New York City , where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations Obama graduated with a B.A. from Columbia in 1983, then worked at Business International Corporation and New York Public Interest Research Group .After four years in New York City, Obama moved to Chicago to work as a community organizer for three years from June 1985 to May 1988 as director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland (Roseland West Pullman ,and Riverdale on Chicago's far South Side During his three years as the DCP's director, its staff grew from 1 to 13 and its annual budget grew from $70,000 to $400,000, with accomplishments including helping set up a job training program, a college preparatory tutoring program, and a tenants' rights organization in Altgeld Gardens . Obama also worked as a consultant and instructor for the Gamaliel Foundation, a community organizing institute.

In mid-1988, he traveled for the first time to Europe for three weeks then Kenya for five weeks where he met many of his Kenyan relatives for the first time.Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988 and at the end of his first year was selected as an editor of the law review based on his grades and a writing competition. In his second year he was elected president of the law review, a full-time volunteer position functioning as editor-in-chief and supervising the law review's staff of 80 editors. Obama's election in February 1990 as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review was widely reported and followed by several long, detailed profiles. He graduated with a J.D. from Harvard in 1991 and returned to Chicago where he had worked as a summer associate at the law firms of Sidley & Austin in 1989 and Hopkins & Sutter in 1990.

The publicity from his election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a contract and advance to write a book about race relations. In an effort to recruit him to their faculty, the University of Chicago Law School provided Obama with a fellowship and an office to work on his book. He originally planned to finish the book in one year, but it took much longer as the book evolved into a personal memoir, at one point Obama retreated to Bali for several months with his wife, Michelle, to work on it without interruptions, before it was finally published as Dreams from My Father in mid-1995. (The father who left him?) This points to a dreamscape where his father is a hero and not a deadbeat who abandoned him.

Obama directed Illinois Project Vote! from April to October 1992, a voter registration drive with a staff of 10 and 700 volunteers that achieved its goal of registering 150,000 of 400,000 unregistered African Americans in the state, leading Crain's Chicago Business to name Obama to its 1993 list of "40 under Forty" powers to be.Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School for twelve years, as a Lecturer for four years (1992-1996), and as a Senior Lecturer for eight years (1996-2004).

In 1993 Obama joined Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, a 12-attorney law firm specializing in civil rights litigation and neighborhood economic development, where he was an associate for three years from 1993 to 1996, then of counsel from 1996 to 2004, with his law license becoming inactive in 2002.

Obama was a founding member of the board of directors of Public Allies in 1992, resigning before his wife, Michelle, became the founding executive director of Public Allies Chicago in early 1993. He served on the board of directors of the Woods Fund of Chicago, which in 1985 had been the first foundation to fund Obama's DCP, from 1993-2002, and served on the board of directors of The Joyce Foundation from 1994-2002. Obama served on the board of directors of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge from 1995-2002, as founding president and chairman of the board of directors from 1995-1999. He also served on the board of directors of the Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, and the Lugenia Burns Hope Center.

Mr.Raila Odinga an African warlord, communist, and presumptive cousin of Obama's, in effect offered to Islamize Kenya in return for Muslim votes, despite the fact that Muslims make up only 10% of the population, compared to the 80% who are Christian. Mr. Odinga himself is nominally an Anglican, yet he signed a document that refers to Islam throughout as "the one true religion" and denigrates Christians as "worshippers of the cross." This is one of many political techniques Obama has learned over the years.Odinga was involved in particular, the burning of a church with up to 50 men, women, and children inside, while machete-armed mobs slaughter up to 600 more people, have evoked memories of the Rwandan genocide of 1994. But I'm sure cousin Raila did it for the good of the workers.Who is behind these massacres? The communist rebel leader, Raila Odinga.Mr. Odinga's father, Oginga Odinga, led the Communist opposition during the Cold War and Raila Odinga was educated in Communist East Germany. His eldest son is named after Fidel Castro. Even more sinister has been Mr. Odinga's electoral pact with the National Muslim Leaders' Forum - a hardline Islamist organization that represents Kenya's Muslim minorityWhat, you will be asking by now, what does any of this have to do with Barack Obama? Mr. Odinga even claims that Mr. Obama is his cousin. Whether or not this true, the two men are friends and political allies. In August 2006, Mr. Obama visited Kenya and spoke in support of Mr. Odinga's candidacy. Obama's grandfather was a communist who supported the brutal Maumau uprising in Kenya when many white settlers were murdered. His father was sent out of the country.

Let's call this: The Dreams of My Grandfathers. Look up the MauMau Uprising with your search engine. Get the truth and then make an informed decision.Globalists have endorsed Obama. The globalist agenda includes communism as a world government. Look at Cuba and imagine the entire USA and World as depressing as that pitiful island. This has to be stopped.

Here's how the story ends:"Even more serious are the doubts raised by Mr. Obama's attitude toward Islam, which has so far received much less scrutiny than might be expected in a post-September 11 presidential election. If Mr. Obama did not know about Mr. Odinga's electoral deal with the Kenyan Islamists when he offered his support, then he should have known. If he did know, then he is guilty of lending the prestige of his office to America's enemies in the global war on terror. We need to know exactly what Mr. Obama knew about Mr. Odinga, and precisely when he knew it." But again, this is silly, he will just lie his way out with some lame off the cuff explanation and his followers will bow down and sing. What the hell is the Democratic Party doing by supporting such a candidate as Obama? Birds of a feather. Simply put.

It shows Sheikh Mahmed Hassan dressing Obama as a Somali elder during Obama's visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya near the borders with Somalia and Ethopia.

The Obama campaign then disavowed the National Examiner's sensationalism, arguing that Obama was dressed in traditional tribal garb, not "Muslim attire," much as President Bush or other U.S. leaders take on local clothing or traditional native costumes when meeting in foreign countries.

Somalia is almost entirely Sunni Muslim, so in that sense the Somali elder garb is also Islamic, but Obama has long denied being a Muslim, asserting that he is Christian, with membership in a Chicago church that focuses on its blackness and support for Africa.

In recent years, a number of Islamic attacks on Christian churches have been reported in Kenya, where the population of some 30 million is about 85 percent Christian and only about 15 percent Muslim.
The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens. This of course is the socialsist way of life.The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a jew hater and critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group. Khalidi thinks Israeli's should stand still, unarmed and die without putting up a fight. How dare the Jews have the "audacity of hope?"In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi's wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002.

Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund's website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000. Obama served on the Wood's Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama's senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s. He is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.The $40,000 grant from Obama's Woods Fund to the AAAN constituted about a fifth of the Arab group's reported grants for 2001, according to tax filings obtained by WND. The $35,000 Woods Fund grant in 2002 also constituted about one-fifth of AAAN's reported grants for that year.The AAAN, headquartered in the heart of Chicago's Palestinian immigrant community, describes itself as working to "empower Chicago-area Arab immigrants and Arab Americans through the combined strategies of community organizing, advocacy, education and social services, leadership development, and forging productive relationships with other communities."It reportedly has worked on projects with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, which supports open boarders and education for illegal aliens.

The AAAN in 2005 sent a letter to New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson in which it called a billboard opposing a North Carolina-New Mexico joint initiative to deny driver's licenses to illegal aliens a "bigoted attack on Arabs and Muslims." Speakers at AAAN dinners and events routinely have taken an anti-Israel line.The group co-sponsored a Palestinian art exhibit, titled, "The Subject of Palestine," that featured works related to what some Palestinians call the "Nakba" or "catastrophe" of Israel's founding in 1948.According to the widely discredited Nakba narrative, Jews in 1948 forcibly expelled hundreds of thousands - some Palestinians claim over one million - Arabs from their homes and then took over the territory.

Historically, about 600,000 Arabs fled Israel after surrounding Arab countries warned they would destroy the Jewish state in 1948. Some Arabs also were driven out by Jewish forces while they were trying to push back invading Arab armies. At the same time, over 800,000 Jews were expelled or left Arab countries under threat after Israel was founded.The theme of AAAN's Nakba art exhibit, held at DePaul University in 2005, was "the compelling and continuing tragedy of Palestinian life ... under [Israeli] occupation ... home demolition ... statelessness ... bereavement ... martyrdom, and ... the heroic struggle for life, for safety, and for freedom." Did you know that their is NO palestinian language, history, culture or people? Did you know that "Palestine" was the name given to Israel (Judea) by a roman ruler in order to wipe the name of Israel of the map? Did you know that this mythical "palestine" used to be in Egypt? Then it was in Jordan and then Lebanon and finally Israel. Another AAAN initiative, titled, "Al Nakba 1948 as experienced by Chicago Palestinians," seeks documents related to the "catastrophe" of Israel's founding. A post on the AAAN site asked users: "Do you have photos, letters or other memories you could share about Al-Nakba-1948?" That posting was recently removed.

The AAAN website currently states the entire site is under construction. I have watched first hand as Israel has suffered under the constant yet futile attacks from Islamic nazis and communist. I have watched as ISM (International Solidarity Movement) members (communist) harass Israeli soldiers and citizens while helping terror groups in their mission to kill Jews/Israelis. I also saw the aftermath of one Rachel Corries battle with a bulldozer. This person was not a sweet and angelic defender of the oppressed she was a rabid Jew hating creature who screamed obsenities and wishes of death to Jews. Pro-PLO advocate held Obama fundraiser, describes Obama as 'sympathetic'AAAN co-founder Rashid Khalidi was reportedly a director of the official PLO press agency WAFA in Beirut from 1976 to 1982, while the PLO committed scores of anti-Western attacks and was labeled by the U.S. as a terror group.

Khalidi's wife, AAAN President Mona Khalidi, was reportedly WAFA's English translator during that period.Rashid Khalidi at times has denied working directly for the PLO but Palestinian diplomatic sources in Ramallah told WND he indeed worked on behalf of WAFA. Khalidi also advised the Palestinian delegation to the Madrid Conference in 1991.During documented speeches and public events, Khalidi has called Israel an "apartheid system in creation" and a destructive "racist" state. He has multiple times expressed support for Palestinian terror, calling suicide bombings response to "Israeli aggression." He dedicated his 1986 book, "Under Siege," to "those who gave their lives ... in defense of the cause of Palestine and independence of Lebanon." Critics assailed the book as excusing Palestinian terrorism. Think about Israeli aggression as they PLO tries to "push the Jews into the sea." Now, who would be the aggressors here? If you follow the thinking of the PLO and their lies that the land belongs to them that they won it in war, then Israel won it back. It was Israel long before Rome pronounced it "Palestina".

If those rules are out the door, then I claim Mecca as mine and they can all leave. While the Woods Fund's contribution to Khalidi's AAAN might be perceived as a one-time run in with Obama, the presidential hopeful and Khalidi evidence a deeper relationship.According to a professor at the University of Chicago who said he has known Obama for 12 years, the Democratic presidential hopeful first befriended Khalidi when the two worked together at the university. The professor spoke on condition of anonymity. Khalidi lectured at the University of Chicago until 2003 while Obama taught law there from 1993 until his election to the Senate in 2004. Khalidi in 2000 held what was described as a successful fundraiser for Obama's failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, a fact not denied by Khalidi.

Speaking in a joint interview with WND and the John Batchelor Show of New York's WABC Radio and Los Angeles' KFI Radio, Khalidi was asked about his 2000 fundraiser for Obama."I was just doing my duties as a Chicago resident to help my local politician," Khalidi stated.Khalidi said he supports Obama for president "because he is the only candidate who has expressed sympathy for the Palestinian cause." Khalidi also lauded Obama for "saying he supports talks with Iran. If the U.S. can talk with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, there is no reason it can't talk with the Iranians." Asked about Obama's role funding the AAAN, Khalidi claimed he had "never heard of the Woods Fund until it popped up on a bunch of blogs a few months ago." He terminated the call when petitioned further about his links with Obama.

Contacted by phone, Mona Khalidi refused to answer WND's questions about the AAAN's involvement with Obama. Obama's campaign headquarters did not reply to a list of WND questions sent by e-mail to the senator's press office.Obama, American terrorist in same circles: Birds of a feather.....Obama served on the board with Ayers, who was a Weathermen leader and has written about his involvement with the group's bombings of the New York City Police headquarters in 1970, the Capitol in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972."I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough," Ayers told the New York Times in an interview released on Sept. 11, 2001."Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon," Ayers wrote in his memoirs, titled "Fugitive Days." He continued with a disclaimer that he didn't personally set the bombs, but his group set the explosives and planned the attack.A $200 campaign contribution is listed on April 2, 2001 by the "Friends of Barack Obama" campaign fund. The two taught appeared speaking together at several public events, including a 1997 University of Chicago panel entitled, "Should a child ever be called a 'super predator?'" and another panel for the University of Illinois in April 2002, entitled, "Intellectuals: Who Needs Them?"

The charges against Ayers were dropped in 1974 because of prosecutorial misconduct, including illegal surveillance.Ayers is married to another notorious Weathermen terrorist, Bernadine Dohrn, who has also served on panels with Obama. Dohrn was once on the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted List and was described by J. Edgar Hoover as the "most dangerous woman in America." Ayers and Dohrn raised the son of Weathermen terrorist Kathy Boudin, who was serving a sentence for participating in a 1981 murder and robbery that left 4 people dead.Obama advisor wants talks with terroristsThe revelations about Obama's relationship with Khalidi follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group. Malley, a principal Obama foreign policy adviser, has penned numerous opinion articles, many of them co-written with a former adviser to the late Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat, petitioning for dialogue with Hamas and blasting Israel for numerous policies he says harm the Palestinian cause. Malley also previously penned a well-circulated New York Review of Books piece largely blaming Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000 when Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and eastern sections of Jerusalem and instead returned to the Middle East to launch an intifada, or terrorist campaign, against the Jewish state. Malley's contentions have been strongly refuted by key participants at Camp David, including President Bill Clinton, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and primary U.S. envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross, all of whom squarely blamed Arafat's refusal to make peace for the talks' failure.

The former insider also identified former Obama worker Shakir Muhammad as a Nation of Islam activist. Muhammad was paid by Obama's office as a photographer in the late 1990s.
According to a black supremacist source tied to Farrakhan, Muhammad previously worked as a bodyguard for the Nation of Islam chief.
The Anti-Defamation League identifies the Nation of Islam, the oldest black nationalist organization, as consistently racist and anti-Semitic.
The Nation of Islam operates "under the guise of instilling African-Americans with a sense of empowerment since its founding in the 1930s," reads an ADL description. Mason did not return a WND request for comment at Obama's Chicago office. Miller did not reply to phone messages left on her cell phone. Michael Ortiz, Obama's deputy press secretary, did not return a WND request for comment about Illinois senator's alleged ties to Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.WND verified the former insider speaking about Obama's Nation of Islam workers held a key position with the presidential candidate.

The former insider said he quit, in part, because of Obama's ties to the Nation of Islam and the senator's positions on Israel. He previously also talked with columnist Debbie Schlussel, who first wrote about the Nation of Islam employees on Obama's staff. "How many Nation of Islam members will work in an Obama White House?" Schlussel asked on her blog. The exact nature of Obama's ties to Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are not unclear but are guarded.

Trumpet magazines cover showed Barack Obama and his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. The presidential candidate repeatedly has denounced Farrakhan's views and would not accept the Nation of Islam leader's high profile endorsement.

"You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments. I think they are unacceptable and reprehensible. I did not solicit this support," Obama said on NBC in February.

"We're not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with minister Farrakhan," Obama said. But Obama's former church of 20 years - Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago - and his former spiritual adviser, Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., have a different view of Farrakhan.

Wright, who accompanied Farrakhan to Libya in 1984, has been involved in Farrakhan initiatives and labeled him "one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st century" during a national address to the media in April at which Nation of Islam officials were invited guests.
Obama has appeared at least three times on the cover of Trumpet magazine, founded by Wright, which in 2007 gave Farrakhan its Empowerment Award.

The magazine, to which Obama last year granted a lengthy, exclusive interview, regularly hails Farrakhan. Obama's face was featured on the cover of a 2006 issue of Trumpet alongside Farrakhan's image.
Wright and Obama reportedly attended the Million Man March on Washington, which was led by Farrakhan and other prominent black leaders such as Al Sharpton.

Another Obama connection to supporters of Farrakhan comes from Obama's chief political strategist, David Axelrod.

Axelrod sits on the finance committee of St. Sabina, the Chicago Catholic parish that was led by controversial pastor Michael Pfleger, an outspoken Farrakhan supporter who hosted the Nation of Islam chief at his parish several times.

The Archdiocese of Chicago yesterday removed Pfleger from his duties at St. Sabina for an unspecified time following a well-publicized sermon at Trinity church two weeks ago in which Pfleger claimed Sen. Hillary Clinton cried in public because she thought being white entitled her to the Democratic presidential nomination.

Pfleger told the Chicago Sun-Times he felt free to speak about Clinton because he believed his sermon was not being recorded. He said he thought the live Internet link that normally broadcasts Trinity sermons was not running.

"They told me it was down," Pfleger said. "Their live streaming had been down all day, and they didn't know whether it was back up. … I regret the dramatization that I was naive enough to believe was just going to be kept among that church."

Pfleger hosted Farrakhan at his church as late as last May, Farrakhan's first public appearance since he announced in 2006 he had been suffering from prostate cancer and was seriously ill.
According to reports, Pfleger spent hours with the Nation of Islam chief during his illness. Pfleger previously enlisted Farrakhan's support for several of his initiatives, including an anti-gun protest last year. Do they actually think that this "global jihad" that is in the works will spare them? Are they as stupid as they act?

Rev. Willie Barrow, a member of the Obama campaign's official Faith Outreach Team, and a pledged Obama superdelegate, is a close friend of Farrakhan's and a staunch Nation of Islam supporter. Farrakhan stated in a 2002 interview he met with Barrow to devise his Nation of Islam platforms.
In 2006, Barrow condemned four Jewish members of the Illinois state Hate Crimes Commission, after Blagojevich refused to remove from the commission Sister Claudette Muhammad, Farrakhan's minister of protocol.
"Not only should [Muhammad] continue to serve on the commission, but, I think those that resigned because they disagree, what have they done to bring about an agreement?" Barrow told the CBS affiliate in Chicago, WBBM.

Cody's Gay Problem

Lets veer off the beaten path and step into the Gay World. It's a colorful and well decorated world, but it's filled with pain and sadness as well, just like the Straight World.

The collective gay communities are diverse and combined they are the total sum of the Gay World. For reasons beyond my control or even theirs, the worlds have been divided and are currently separated from the straight one. There is currently an uneasy truce between the two worlds and both sides are a bit anxious. This is silly.

Gay human beings have been reduced to various letters to describe them. GLBTQ is gay, lesbian,bisexual, transgendered and questioning. This is usually tagged onto the kids and teens. I have read loads of literature and endless websites dedicated to these wonderful kids and teens and not once have I seen them constantly referred to as "humans beings" by their own so called champions and defenders.

The left wing comes charging up to the rescue and defense of these kids and teens. I've witnessed this many times over. Once they arrive on the scene they begin protesting, marching, screaming, and arguing for the sexuality of these kids and teens. This is stupid. Why? Because there is so much more to these beautiful and wonderful human beings other than their "sexuality." They are "kids and teens". Lost in all the political correctness of the moment is the fact that these kids have hopes and dreams and feelings that go beyond sexual desires.

Example: There is a kid named Cody. He was at the time 15 years old, a sophomore. This kid was amazingly intelligent and was an honor student. He had such a peaceful and compassionate personality and would make any parent proud to have him as a son. I would have been thrilled if he were mine. He has so much promise and ability that I'm quite certain he will improve the world we all currently occupy if given the respect and the chance he deserves.

Cody was being bullied at school by other kids and teens who think of Cody only as a sexual creature. Cody was called fag, homo, and a host of other hurtful and demeaning labels. This hurt Cody as a human being very deeply. He complained to the school faculty and to his family. Everyone responded like this was some sort of political movement or rally. Cody was referred to the school counselor who in turn had him join the Gay Straight Student Alliance. This was like having Cody join a mutual admiration society but did not fix the problem. As Cody's off campus counselor I took a great interest in this case. You see, I know this kid and spent a great deal of time listening to the expressions of his soul.
I decided to sit in on one of the Gay-Straight Alliance Meetings and kept my big mouth shut. I was there only to observe and learn and that I did. The majority of the time the kids and teens were focused on their sexuality and their clothes and creative abilities. They were all encouraged to feel free to be themselves, to be gay or lesbian or bisexual or transgendered or questioning or straight. So, with the focus being on their sexuality or lack thereof I couldn't see how these kids and teens were going to actually get anywhere. How is this going to solve their problems and give them a fair shot at life? This was only going to further instill stereotypes and reduce them back down to mere sexual creatures instead of human beings. This is what we get from the left wing. More indoctrination with all the fluff and puff of psychological marshmallow and no real answers.

When the political grand standing was over and the dust settled there were still bullies and Cody was still nothing more than a gay kid. Nothing had changed other than some misguided adults got to feel better about themselves for coming to the defense of this kid and others like him. They made matters worse. Cody was still being harassed and eventually was beaten up at school. Again, the left wing comes charging in screaming "hate crime!"

I watched this madness unfold before me in utter disgust. Cody was lifted up as the poster boy for gay teens and was damn near martyred for the cause while well meaning adults ran around demanding his rights and protesting. The adults demanded and got "gay sensitivity" teaching for the school and then quietly stepped back to watch the miracle of peace and harmony gently rest upon the school. Uh, this didn't happen. You cannot teach that which one does not desire to learn. You cannot make people practice those things you demand they practice, you will have conflict.

In steps the right wing parents demanding that "faggotry" NOT be taught to their kids and vowed to sue the school system into bankruptcy. The battle lines were drawn and the war was on. The left and right fighting back and forth complete with name calling and screams. From the left "homophobes and bigot" from the right "sinner, sodomite and you are all going to burn in hell." Still Cody was not helped nor did it solve any of his problems. He was now the problem as some put it. The victim from the point of view of others. They all forgot Cody is a human being and a kid. Cody was under attack but the adults made homosexuality the victim or the enemy depending on your point of view.

Cody was a quiet and smiling boy with such amazing abilities that it was and still is a joy to know him. He had a smile that would light up the room and when he sang he did so with such passion as it could make angels weep if you believe in angels.

Cody sat in my study about a week after being beaten up at school and very humbly looked up at me through those big dark eyes and at almost a whisper said. "Help me, please help me." He then broke down and wept. This kid was breaking down. His whole world had been turned upside down. He was hurting so much inside that words escaped him. His body became almost totally limp as he sat in the chair slumped over weeping. I felt such pain coming from him that it physically effected me.
Cody didn't have the answers and everyone in their rush to defend him had forgotten he was merely a human being not a gay teen. Yes Cody is gay, but more than that he is human and it was way past time that I stuck my neutral nose into the fray and that I did. Cody is a kid who is gay but Cody is not a "gay teen." He is a human teen and should be approached as such. Not labeled, not different, not less than human, and certainly not alone.

I went to meet with the principal who was besieged and was grasping for straws trying to keep the school functioning among all the BS that had flooded into the class rooms and hallways. I sat down with the principal and began to assist her in formulating a workable plan that would end the current war. It was decided that treating GLBTQ kids and teens as different was stupid. It was also agreed that in order for them to be truly equal that those responsible for the mistreatment of others would be punished quickly and effectively without the issue of ones sexuality. If you proclaim punishment and involve sexuality you separate people and create a difference. This is the old "separate but equal" mindset. Cody, if anything was "better" than those who were cruel to him. But yet Cody only wanted to be equal. I was not doing these things or saying these things because they were my ideas, they were Cody's wishes and I cheered his ideas. His own wisdom which was never solicited was now becoming more than mere words. They were now being put into action and becoming reality.

The principal enacted a policy approved by the school board that any behavior which prevented a students access to education or interfered with his or her education would be instantly addressed and dealt with. Any student who causes harm to, or harasses another for any reason would be immediately removed from the school and placed in alternative school where their behavior could be modified by education and not political dogma. They would remain in alternative school for one full school year or more if the counselor deemed their behavior had not changed. The school settled down and the student body began a gradual change for the better and Cody returned to his beloved school with his various friends and had no more problems other than those that are common to kids and teens. The GLBTQ kids and teens still have their support group but the focus of it all has changed. No longer is the focus on being GLBTQ but on being the best human beings they can be.

Reality teaches us that we cannot always agree and we are all unique in our own ways. The way we deal with others is often more important than simply dealing with problems. If we deal with people and do so fairly with our focus on humanity instead of labels and sexuality the problems will dissolve on their own. Children are children, approach them as though they are and treat them well. It is our responsibility to nurture, protect, and guide these young ones until they can take the reigns themselves.

Let's take a gander at the political landscape just for grins and giggles. There is an old saying that goes along these lines. "Ignorance can be cured by education and experience, but, stupid is terminal." This is true and plays itself out daily in the politics of America.
You see them all the time. Smiling politicians who only "want to serve" their communities. They want to lead us into "Shangrala" or to a better more prosperous and peaceful world. They are our "leaders", our elected officials.

Well, I've read the Constitution of the United States and I have yet found anywhere in this hallowed document that says we should elect "leaders." We don't need "leaders", we do however need elected representatives who carry out the will of the people but the opposite is true.

These elected officials once in office decide to turn the tables and announce to us that they are our elected "leaders". With this new lofty position they begin to tell us, what to do. This is the problem. They work for us. How many of you who own a business would allow an employee to come in and tell you the direction the company needs to take or tell you how to operate your own business? None would. But this is exactly what happens in the political office arena.

Who do they represent? Themselves actually and anyone who can provide them with benefits, bribes, or a monetary advantage. Lobbying groups vary as do their agendas. 100% of the corporate lobbies are in place to insure that they have the advantage in the market place and are protected from the law of the land. They are the ones who write legislation to their own benefit and hand if over to the "elected leader" who then in turn insures it becomes the law of the land. They have in fact purchased the government from those we elected and thus laws are actually created in board rooms and on the golf course.

All this occurs while we are occupied with "hot button or third rail issues" that if you notice, nothing is ever done about them. We are divided and begin fighting each other while the elected leaders do "business" and are unaccountable to anyone but their corporate masters. Look at the Federal Election Commission website and research the people or corporations that fund these political leaders then look at the voting record of these "elected leaders" and if you are bright enough you can put two and two together. It doesn't take a MENSA member to figure it all out.
Who is our best bet, the right or the left wing? Neither. With that said which one is the safest? We have to decide that for ourselves after careful consideration.

Let's take a look at abortion. This is a "hot button" issue that evokes passion and sometimes rage. Is abortion actually a "woman's right to choose?" To some women it is because they have been educated to believe this and in their logic it remains there "right". On the opposite end of the spectrum are people who are opposed to abortion and consider it murder. Now, if you believe it is a woman's right you will call the unborn a "fetus" and that "dehumanizes" the growing life inside the woman body so it's quite easy to kill without conscience.

If you are of the belief that life begins at conception you consider the "fetus" an "unborn child" who needs to be protected from the abortionist. So who is correct? Is there a compromise that can be reached? No. Because both sides are correct and you'll never change their minds. But, let's look deeper into the subject of abortion as today's example of reality.
The right wing declares they are "pro-life" advocates. This enrages those who are of the opposite opinion. The left wingers call themselves "pro-choice" and this enrages the people who hold an opposing belief. So the pissing match is on. There is no hope of coming together. We are fighting each other constantly over these and other issues. People who hold to their religious convictions cannot be swayed away from it all though they do at times "fall short of the Glory of God" or "sin" as they say but then repent. People who do not believe in a god or Deity of any kind cannot be convinced there is one and therefor don't feel obliged to follow any set of rules deemed to have their origin in religious practice. No coming together here either.

O.K., we've yammered on pointing out the obvious thus far and still haven't yet arrived at the reality check this blog was created for. The reality is, the only reason abortion of readily available in the United States as it is, is because it's one lucrative business. The right wing proclaims the virtue of protecting the unborn life, yet abortion is still here. The left wing proclaims the virtue of a woman's right to choose and abortion is not abated. The majority of the US Supreme Court are of the right wing party and have the power to change the political landscape of our country. They can strike Roe v. Wade at anytime they so desire but why don't they? Because, it's big business. Money. It's VERY profitable. But we grill our prospective Justices by asking that third rail question, "what are your views on abortion?" Then the sparks fly and We The People, fall for it every time.

We are looking for life on Mars, yet inside a woman's womb we can only find a "fetus". It's not a person. The law says it's not. Science says it's not a person so we are free to eliminate it at will because it will inconvenience us. On the other end of the spectrum it is a life, God says it is, the religious leaders say it is and the devout say it is and deserves protection. The law, supported by sciences can say whatever the intellectual elite want it to say. The law will say whatever the invested corporate or business interest want it to say. We are still at an impasse when it comes to reality. What does common sense say? It depends on who's common sense it is actually.
Reality says that the "fetus" is an unborn human child. Reality says that the woman who has this "fetus" inside her is in control of her own body and thus everything inside it. The decision is hers. Now, if abortion were not profitable women would be at home performing abortions on themselves. Do you honestly believe that any abortionist would provide the service for free? No, he or she would not do this for free, they would take up the practice of something more lucrative. Abortion does not have a noble and heroic past steeped in the lore of "a woman's right to choose." It was founded in order to rid the world of "coloreds and the less desirable or as they used to say in bigoted terms, the "mud people "among other hateful and stupid ways of describing other human beings.

I personally am a religious and spiritual person. I am guided by my beliefs but I do not expect you to be guided by them. I believe in "free will." I will exercise my free will and you exercise your free will. We all will have to live with the consequences of our free will. I will not tell a woman that she cannot have an abortion even though I might be opposed to it. I will however tell her to make an informed decision based on fact and to follow her beliefs systems and this does not violate my religious beliefs. I have found that the reality is I am not her master nor is she mine. Does the man involved in this theoretical pregnancy have any say in the matter? Yes he does but he has no power in the decision making process. The law says so. The law says a lot of things doesn't it? Who makes the law speak? We've already discussed that issue. Money makes the law speak.

Now let's continue on this political landscape and gaze upon the madness that is called Washington D.C.

The right wing like the left is bemoaning the high price of oil and pain at the pump. Who is to blame for this. We must have someone to blame and someone must have the answer to our problem.

The right wing wants to drill for more oil and thus bring down the price of oil. Can we do this? The reality is no. We are being held hostage for the most part until we pay the ransom. The ransom is to allow the oil corporations drill where ever they want. The reason the oil prices are so high is because the OPEC nations are gearing up for war and are building a monetary war chest. The futures speculators on Wall St. are taking advantage of this and driving the price even higher. If we drilled in every state of the Union and were drowning in oil the futures traders would still drive the price up and the oil companies would blame the cost if refining on the increase cost. That is reality.

The left wing however wants to hug and bugger trees, save the whales and convert to other forms of energy to save the planet. They are in control of the Congress right now and can't muster enough votes to override a veto from a lame duck president. The left wing has elected "leaders" in Washington yet cannot seem to get anything done. Why is this? Because they are BS artist and hypocrites just like their right wing counterparts.
The left wing has hijacked the educational system here in the United States and they have an accomplice, the right wing. Education has been replaced with indoctrination. Children are confused and are sorely lacking in Math and Science skills as well are reading comprehension because they are so busy being taught to embrace so many other ideologies. Their parents are the enemy and their parents mode of thinking is outdated. Parents are oppressive and must be overcome. The left wing educational system must be the champion of a tired and dangerous ideology network.
In eastern and western Europe sexual attitudes are very different than here. The Europeans think of children and teens as sexual creatures and the age of consent reflects this. In Asia and the far east it's even worse. Children are property and sexual creatures. The age of consent in some countries is as low as 12 years old. The lawmakers of those countries under pressure from the west have had to adjust the Age of Consent laws in order to obtain an economic reward from the "prudish" West. They have done this with full intention of NOT enforcing the laws but mainly ignore them unless it involves forcible rape or the commercial use of children in the sex trade. Europe for the most part is left wing. The left in the US proclaim that children have rights. Children should be able to go and have an abortion for example without parental knowledge or consent. This is the first stepping stone that will lead this country to the place the left wing wants us to go.

I believe children should have human rights. They should be loved, protected, provided for, educated and kept in good health. They should in fact have a childhood full of wonderful and healthy memories that help them to grow into rational, compassionate and independent adults. The right wing desires to have children march about like an army of corporate conformist while the left wing wants them to march to their drum beat.
The left wing wants children and teens to learn about sex. Use condoms and be safe. The left teaches them they are sexual creatures that should have a right to be in control of their own bodies. The left tosses in the phrase "if someone touches you and makes you feel uncomfortable tell a grown up." The child or teen in my humble opinion should not be in a position to be "touched" in the first place. The left has declared that "morals" and "religious principals" are bad and their doctrine is good. The left wants children to be "little youthful adults" with a voice and rights to exercise. The pedophiles are cheering this on. Once they have these so called rights, then the door is open for them to choose to have sex with adults and it's the child's right. Do you think we are not headed in this direction? If you think we are not you would be dead wrong. This is exactly where we are heading. Take away the parental rights and control, turn it over to the state, then those who control the state will make decisions for your children. You will have no say.

Will the right wing stop this madness? No. They are just as much a part of the problem as the left wing is. Members of congress on both sides enjoy sex with teens and children. They will travel to the ends of the earth if need be to enjoy this fetish. Billions of dollars each years are spent in the child sex industry. It's like the days of prohibition but much much worse. Sexual predators are smiling because like they wolf, they can smell it in the wind. They know it's coming.

If given the rights of an adult a child can then say that what the adult did to them and with them sexually was not abuse but consensual and healthy. The reality is, that sex is dangerous even for adults. We get diseases and some of them ruin our lives if they don't kill us eventually. Now are we really willing to hand this over to teens and children? Can't we think of something more healthy and beneficial to occupy their time and youth other than sex?

The left uses the media and it's various outlets to teach their doctrine. The right wing makes money off it. They are both guilty. Now this question begs to be answered. Am I old fashioned or out of touch? Do the things my parents taught me, which came from the trial and error of our forefathers, not count even though they are helpful and based in "reality."

Some Things Need To Be Addressed

Welcome to my "blog". I'm quite certain it's obvious that "blogging" has become a popular way to reach the masses or small groups that are interested in what I have to say.

My name is Will and all of you can call me "Will", even if you disagree with anything I have to say. I'd love to hear from those who agree or disagree as well.

I'm a graduate of Johns-Hopkins University with a Master of Arts in Behavioral Psychology. I develop psychological profiles for a living and as a hobby. I will tackle many subjects on this blog and rest assured I have taken the time to research each subject. I've always held my own ideas about these subjects then I challenged myself to test the validity of what I believed was true.

With that said, that which I will publish here is in fact "reality" or "true". Whether I like it or not, I must bow to reality and truth. Some will say that reality is what we "perceive it to be" or "truth is subjective" or a myriad of other "cliche's" that allow them to live in their imaginary worlds they've created.

We've all heard the phrase "open minded"? Well, that's a load of superfluous BS. When someone tells me to be "open minded" it indicates to me that they are not. They have a specific view point and ideology and want me to accept it without question. They smile while they say this every time. If you, for example, "blow them out of the water" or "poke holes" in their theories you'll see how open minded they are. They will curse and shout and call you narrow minded. I find it to be quite funny.

I will tackle many subjects here and among them are: Politics, the gay communities, (yes, there is more than one gay community), the Middle East, Religion, Society, Crime, Government as well as any other "third rail" subject I deem worthy of my attention.

If any of you have topics of discussion you'd like to discuss here drop me a line and we will look into it.